You Mean Like Democrats?

Thanks for this Conner. Been looking for the clip of this for awhile but never knew what it was called. Taken from The Ghost Breakers starring Bob Hope, 1940. Larry Elder uses the audio as an intro clip as part of his rotation of intro thingies.


.........................
RIP United States of America

July 1776 - November 2012.

       
« Obama Quakes With Fear
Constitutional Crisis »

Posted on Oct 28, 2008 6:54 pm by Samson in: , | 64 comment(s) [Closed]
Comments
Always happy to help out where I can. ;)

       
Despite my inability to watch the videos you've posted (due to using University computer labs), i have found an article quite interesting and thought I'd share it with you.

http://fredshelm.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/barack-the-black-hitler/

       
Speechless. That article was very enlightening Clyos. Everyone should go read it and think long and hard about it before punching that card or pulling that lever, or touching the screen, or whatever method you're using to vote. Seriously. Go read it.

       
Incredible. In today's political climate, I'd strongly been very hesitant to directly compare Adolph & Barak, but I had pointed out, by email, several times already in this campaign that what I'd seen in my rather limited research on the man was that he was strongly anti-semitic, which by itself is a deal breaker for me since I'm Jewish. As gravely concerned about the possibility of his being elected next week as I already had been, this is truly discouraging...

       
Wow. OK. I know this started off as a humor post, but damn. This is really getting scary now: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29263

Anyone remember the "Fairness Doctrine"? Yeah, you know, the one where you're forced to offer "both sides" in a supposed bid to be "fair" in what you present? Apparently fair means whatever the left thinks. This doctrine was rightly eliminated during the Reagan administration, and rightly vetoed by Reagan when the Dems tried to pass it again as law. It's a blatant assault on free speech. And disturbingly fits in with the previous link to the Nazi stuff.

We all better pray hard that McCain wins and all this stuff goes away. At least for 4 more years. I can already predict what will be said should McCain win. "The Republicans stole another one!" or some shit similar to it.

       
Hmm, that posting says that the FCC is giving these 19 analysts 30 days to respond to the letters, but not what possible outcomes of these letters might be.

But I do have to agree that it certainly seems as though that previous link was far more on target than perhaps even it's original author realized. If Obama becomes our next president (regardless of whether he's actually qualified or not) we, as a country, may be in for a lot more trouble than most folks here have ever dreamed even could take place in America. :(

       
StifflersMOM said:
Comment #7 Nov 1, 2008 4:24 am
“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
— Adolf Hitler


http://fredshelm.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/barack-the-black-hitler/ <-- this is nothing but fear mongering propaganda.

It is not hard to deduce Obama’s opinions of his audience. When he’s in public he uses vague terms such as “hope” and “change” rather than attempt to define exactly what it is he intends to do.

“I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.”
— Adolf Hitler


LOL you have to be kidding right? words like WE, HOPE, CHANGE, US and the like are called SPIN TERMS, they are used by all sides of politics when they either want to engage an audience and let them own the ideas or when the speaker does not really have a clear policy on that idea.

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”
— Adolf Hitler

Its no big secret that Obama bases most of his appeal with youth voters. This is a common occurrence in the history of the rise of tyrants.


Obama does not seek to OWN the youth, he does however reach out to the voting audience and the youth sector is but one of them. McCain and Palin like to reach out to Red Neck racist middle, the gun lobby, pro life, evangelicals and plenty of other groups who would like to dictate and force their beliefs over your life.

The rest of that blog is hardly worth debunking and i feel very sorry for anyone who actually believes any of that is the truth. Even the cited sources in that post are fictitious, drop them into a search and they come up with more Race Hate sites and other Obama hate sites, not the quoted source like Jerusalem Post.

       
LOL you have to be kidding right? words like WE, HOPE, CHANGE, US and the like are called SPIN TERMS, they are used by all sides of politics when they either want to engage an audience and let them own the ideas or when the speaker does not really have a clear policy on that idea.


It seems you understood the point of the article far more clearly than you realized since you just pegged it dead on. Obama doesn't have a clear policy on any of his so-called ideas other than a mad lust for power.

Obama does not seek to OWN the youth


Nope. Not at all. Except for their incomes that is. He doesn't want the physical human slaves. He just wants their hard earned money so he can give it to deadbeats and illegals. It's a flimsy distinction though because in the end those youth learn quickly that working for a living is bad, government handouts are good, and then ... oh crap. I guess he really *DOES* want to own the youth after all. Sorry, you lose.

Personally I think it's rather disgusting that Obama is reaching out to baby killers, terrorists, traitors, Marxists, socialists, and black racist groups and other folks of their kind who seek to dictate and force their beliefs on our lives. Given the choice, I'd much rather have McCain imposing the 1st and 2nd amendment on me, imposing a love for life and liberty, and imposing honor and dignity on us all. But I guess that's just too horrible to think about for people on the left.

Obama's support for the Fairness Doctrine tells me he's against the 1st Amendment.
Obama's support for massive gun control tells me he's against the 2nd Amendment.
Obama's support for abortion, up to and including partial birth at full term, tells me he supports murder.
Obama's support for surrender in Iraq tells me he supports terrorists.
His association with Bill Ayers tells me he supports traitors.
Obama's support for Reverend Wright for 20+ years tells me he supports black racism. Despite his now not being a member of the church. Something he ceased doing only when it began hurting him in the primaries.
His statements caught on camera to Joe the Plumber tell me he supports Marxist/socialist redistribution of wealth. This position is further confirmed by the tapes that have come out from interviews he held back in 2001.
So by extension it's also clear he wouldn't support liberty either if you disagree with him and dare to call him out for it.

A man like that therefore has no honor or dignity and is merely a powermad megalomaniac. Plenty of folks who could rightly make the short leap to comparing him with Hitler. Especially since the similarities are so alarming.

When you can find such things and the evidence to back them up about McCain and Palin, the world is ready to listen. I suspect we'll all have died of old age before that happens though.

       
Well said, Samson. Especially this part:

Samson said:

Given the choice, I'd much rather have McCain imposing the 1st and 2nd amendment on me, imposing a love for life and liberty, and imposing honor and dignity on us all. But I guess that's just too horrible to think about for people on the left.

Obama's support for the Fairness Doctrine tells me he's against the 1st Amendment.
Obama's support for massive gun control tells me he's against the 2nd Amendment.
Obama's support for abortion, up to and including partial birth at full term, tells me he supports murder.
Obama's support for surrender in Iraq tells me he supports terrorists.
His association with Bill Ayers tells me he supports traitors.
Obama's support for Reverend Wright for 20+ years tells me he supports black racism. Despite his now not being a member of the church. Something he ceased doing only when it began hurting him in the primaries.
His statements caught on camera to Joe the Plumber tell me he supports Marxist/socialist redistribution of wealth. This position is further confirmed by the tapes that have come out from interviews he held back in 2001.
So by extension it's also clear he wouldn't support liberty either if you disagree with him and dare to call him out for it.

That's pretty much my stance. I don't agree with all of McCain's platforms, in fact, as anyone who's followed this site long enough certainly already knows, I don't even feel that McCain is close to being my candidate of choice based on even just those who ran this time. But in the final analysis, we all know one of the two major party representatives will be the winner, and if I have to choose between Obama and McCain, I'll take McCain hands down without reservations or hesitation. So, "Mr. Obama" can feel as sorry for me as he'd like to, but his socialist would-be dictator is not going to get my vote regardless.

       
Obama's support for massive gun control tells me he's against the 2nd Amendment.


This shows me that Obama is like a great number of other people who are sick and tired of gang violence, gun murder and suicides. The USA is one of the only places left in the world without proper gun regulation and the amount of gun violence shows that your freedoms and liberties that you take for granted are the reason your society is killing your own citizens and why your jails are filled to over flowing.

Obama's support for abortion, up to and including partial birth at full term, tells me he supports murder.


No it does not, this show how forward thinking he actually is and how he does not pander to the pro lifers and the evangelicals. It is about time someone in US politics has the balls to stand up to the evangelicals and pro lifers and pushed for my womanly rights to do what they hell i want with my body. My rights should not be dictated to by religious groups, the concept of separation of church and state is there for a reason, thats to keep ideology out of political decisions. I do not care what they do on Sunday just do not try and dictate to me what i should and should not do with my body.

Obama's support for surrender in Iraq tells me he supports terrorists.


This tells me that Obama does not support big oil, which is what the was was about in the first place and that pulling out while difficult is the wisest course of action in a war that was based on the lies and deceptions of the Bush regime. Bush should be impeached for the lies he knowingly told the American people.

When you can find such things and the evidence to back them up about McCain and Palin,


Palin is the most ignorant and inarticulate person ever to grace the ballot. Her outlandish claims include that the Vice President is is in charge of the senate, that dinosaurs and humans lived together.

When asked she about what books or magazines she reads regularly, she replied she was not interested in such things. For someone who claims be be the vioce of the evangelicals you would have thought she would read her bible, but Oh No No NO, she is not interested in reading. Here is a puppet on a string that will regurgitate whatever is needed to win the minds of the religious without ever knowing who her god is.

The only supreme court decision of importance she knows about is Roe vrs Wade and even people in Guatemala know that one. In unscripted interviews Palin is unable to put together intelligible on topic ranging from finance to foreign policy.

Palin is on the ticket for one reason only, to reach out to rednecks, pro lifers, evangelicals, narrow minded bigots and for this reason alone McCain should lose the election.

       
Nope. Not at all. Except for their incomes that is.


If you have not noticed, America is BANKRUPT. Tax reform is going to have to happen and its even going to hurt us all, but our excesses cannot go on forever. Eventually we need to pay back the trillions of dollars of debt we owe, have a balanced budget and a government surplus. And yes Joe the Plumber will have to pay his fair share. Pretty typical of anyone earning over 100K a year to not want to pay their fair share of taxes. The rich in this country do not pay a proportional amount of taxes when compared to what they earn and its about time they did.

       
Speak for yourself, Ms. Obama. Some of us are most decidedly not BANKRUPT either financially or morally. We may not be doing well financially at the moment, but bankrupt we are not. Taxes have never been, in this country or any other that I know of, handled completely fairly across the board, nor will they ever be, what Obama has been preaching is not fairness in taxation, it's a pipe dream called Marxist Socialism.

       
This shows me that Obama is like a great number of other people who are sick and tired of gang violence, gun murder and suicides. The USA is one of the only places left in the world without proper gun regulation and the amount of gun violence shows that your freedoms and liberties that you take for granted are the reason your society is killing your own citizens and why your jails are filled to over flowing.


I'm going to infer from this utterly ignorant statement that you're not a US citizen, resident, or even knowledgeable enough to comment on this issue. There's numerous studies available to prove that what you just said is complete crap.

In states where people are allowed to apply for and hold concealed carry permits, crime rates have dropped off considerably. Florida, Idaho, and Texas all make for excellent examples of why you have no idea what you're talking about. Washington DC, California, and New York all provide excellent examples of just how ineffective oppressive gun control really is. Violent crimes in these 3 states are out of control, gang crime is through the roof, and it's all because law abiding citizens have had their 2nd Amendment rights suppressed by their local governments. But don't take my word for it: http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=2149

No it does not, this show how forward thinking he actually is and how he does not pander to the pro lifers and the evangelicals. It is about time someone in US politics has the balls to stand up to the evangelicals and pro lifers and pushed for my womanly rights to do what they hell i want with my body. My rights should not be dictated to by religious groups, the concept of separation of church and state is there for a reason, thats to keep ideology out of political decisions. I do not care what they do on Sunday just do not try and dictate to me what i should and should not do with my body.


Nobody is stopping you from doing what you want to you own body. Mark it up with tattoos. Draw green circles on your head. Slice off your fingerprints. Jab needles into your veins. Go right ahead. However according to all that's sane, logical, and right, your right to do all that ends at the point it brings harm to another living human being. It makes no difference to anyone with true compassion and respect for life if that human being is being carried around inside your uterus instead of being pushed around in a baby carriage. There are reasons several states have laws on the books that count it as two murders if someone slaughters a pregnant woman. Stop and think about why that is. Then stop and ask yourself why Obama wants to discard all that and force baby murder down everyone's throats because people like you wake up with a headache two days before full term and decide to snuff out a life before it ever had a chance. It has nothing to do with ideology either.

This tells me that Obama does not support big oil, which is what the was was about in the first place and that pulling out while difficult is the wisest course of action in a war that was based on the lies and deceptions of the Bush regime. Bush should be impeached for the lies he knowingly told the American people.


This tells me you're an ignorant clod who listens to too many MSNBC reports without knowing the full story. The continuation of the Iraq War of 1991 has nothing to do with big oil. It has everything to do with removing a madman from power and his support of terrorists operating within his former country. On this front, I have something you need to read:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007540
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200401/pollack

Read those, then come back here and tell us who actually lied about Iraq. Until then, pull your head out of your ass and learn how our Constitution works with regard to presidential impeachment before you start acting like you know something about it.

BTW, if we were there to steal Iraq's oil, perhaps you can explain to me why I'm still paying over $3/gallon for gasoline? I thought stealing free oil was supposed to lower the price?

Palin is the most ignorant and inarticulate person ever to grace the ballot. Her outlandish claims include that the Vice President is is in charge of the senate, that dinosaurs and humans lived together.


Clearly you're from another planet. And your Constitutional ignorance is shining through once more.

Article I, Section III: The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. Palin is entirely correct that the VP is "in charge" of the Senate. The VP is legally in charge of crafting rules for the operation of the Senate, though traditionally they don't usually bother with that and leave it up to the members.

As far as dinosaurs and humans living together, I challenge you to prove to me where she said that herself. Even the Bible never comes right out and says that dinosaurs walked the Earth. In fact, it makes no mention of the existence of dinosaurs at all. Genesis sure as hell doesn't say anything about T-Rex kickin it with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

Further, regardless of whether you believe in the Bible as the Word of God, you are aware it's just a book, yes? Written and then later translated many many times by flawed, fallible, human beings? Of which myself, yourself, and Palin all qualify as.

I wonder though what you think of Biden and his lies, misrepresentations, and outright boneheaded statements.

Palin is on the ticket for one reason only, to reach out to rednecks, pro lifers, evangelicals, narrow minded bigots and for this reason alone McCain should lose the election.


Obama was nominated to the ticket for one reason only, to reach out to socialists, baby killers, atheists, and narrow minded intolerant liberals. For this reason alone he should lose the election.

If you have not noticed, America is BANKRUPT. Tax reform is going to have to happen and its even going to hurt us all, but our excesses cannot go on forever. Eventually we need to pay back the trillions of dollars of debt we owe, have a balanced budget and a government surplus. And yes Joe the Plumber will have to pay his fair share. Pretty typical of anyone earning over 100K a year to not want to pay their fair share of taxes. The rich in this country do not pay a proportional amount of taxes when compared to what they earn and its about time they did.


I have noticed that America is having some difficulty, yes. But bankruptcy carries with it a certain legal definition. A stock market correction does not a bankrupt nation make. Yes, tax reform needs to happen. Income taxes need to be eliminated entirely. A national sales tax needs to exist to take its place. Then Donald Trump, Joe the Plumber, you, me, and everyone else will be utterly unable to avoid paying their "fair share" as you put it. For we will all need to buy things. Even those people right now who pay nothing at all in income taxes. We also need to eliminate the Death Tax, capital gains tax, and taxes on things like gambling winnings and game show prizes. We need to eliminate Social Security ( yes, I said it ) and replace that failed system with a privatized retirement system. If you elect not to do this, tough shit, guess you starve to death after you turn 65. Of course we already have plenty of people who do this now. It's called a 401K.

Right now the rich pay an unfairly large burden of taxes. The top 5 percent (those making more than $153,542 – the group whose taxes Obama seeks to raise) pay 60 percent of all federal income taxes. The rich (aka the top 1 percent of income earners, those making more than $388,806 a year), according to the IRS, pay 40 percent of all federal income taxes. The top 1 percent's taxes comprise 17 percent of the federal government's revenue from all sources, including corporate taxes, excise taxes, social insurance and retirement receipts. http://www.ocregister.com/articles/percent-income-taxes-2185029-pay-rich

A U.S. News & World Report blogger went to the Democratic National Convention in Denver and conducted an informal poll of 24 DNC delegates. He asked them, "What should 'the rich' pay in income taxes?" Half the respondents said "25 percent"; 25 percent said "20 percent"; 12 percent said "30 percent"; and another 12 percent said "35 percent." The average DNC delegate wanted the rich to pay 25.6 percent, which is lowerthan what the rich pay now – both by share of taxes and by tax rate! (from the same article)

Interesting, no? Your DNC delegates seem to agree that rich folk are already paying more than what they should be paying!

The article makes some other rather interesting points about charity and party affiliation too. I bet that's got to burn your butt.

       
Would you like me to cite for you all economists who state that AMERICA the country is BANKRUPT. This has nothing to do with either of our personal financial states. The US government does not have the ability or income to repay the debts it has, that is called bankruptcy. The excesses of the past 2 or more presidencies have left this country so debt laden (not personal debt, government debt) that it might take generations for it to recover. If you wish to waste your vote on the continuation of the existing regime then that's your choice, however, one day we are going to have to face up to these debts and now is always better than later.

       
No, not quite. What you describe is called default. And I don't recall saying anything about my personal financial state, nor do I recall making mention of yours either.

If the US government were bankrupt, there would have been a declaration stating such. That hasn't happened. Also, when filing for bankruptcy, one generally eliminates all existing debt owed to anyone with a claim. In some cases though, the debt is resolved at a substantially reduced value, often pennies on the dollar.

Also, bankrupt nations typically are not able to enact legislation to bail out their corporate finance sectors to the tune of $700 billion. The government clearly still has money left somewhere to offer as loans. Maybe we should do what banks do when this happens and consider the $700 billion as taken off the principal balance left on the National Debt. I mean hell, if I owed you $10, and you came and asked to borrow $4 from me, I'd be a fool not to simply deduct that $4 from the $10 I owe and be left with a balance of $6.

And in case you forgot, because a lot of leftists seem to have, the United States was already falling into recession when Clinton left office. Bush assumed an economy already in decline. Then perhaps you recall what happened on September 11, 2001? If not, we were attacked. The effects of which were not good on an already slumping economy. Then maybe you'll recall that we went to war in Afghanistan. And later resumed our war in Iraq. All of this places a pretty heavy burden on an economy that was receding. However, you might also recall that Bush cut taxes. Leftists everywhere said he was insane for doing so in the middle of two wars. Turns out it was the right decision. Our economy grew at the largest rates in the last 40 years. Unemployment was at all time historical lows. Job creation was in excess of 6 million by the time the housing market crashed.

As for the cause of the housing market crash? Well. I'll give you a clue. It was called the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. It mandated that banks loosen credit restrictions to enable low income workers to afford housing. The only way they could afford such things is with loans the banks and Congress new damn well would never be paid back. Pop quiz time. Who was president in 1977? Who controlled Congress in 1977? I'll give you a hint. They're referred to as blue-staters by some. They gave birth to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Perhaps you've heard of them?

John McCain made several attempts to get Fannie and Freddie better regulated because he saw the crisis looming. Bad loans had begun to pile up unpaid. The banks had sold junk paper to investors on Wall Street for 30 years. It was only a matter of time before the bubble burst, just like the dot com bubble burst back in 1999. Who blocked regulation from being approved? Barney Frank. What party affiliation is he? Again, I'll give you a hint. Blue stater.

Now, I'm sure I need not remind you of this, but who is currently in control of Congress in the United States? When did things in the economy begin to deteriorate? If you answered Democrats and 2007, you get the gold star. Funny how that seems to work, isn't it?

       
The Palins, Sarah and Todd, are members of the radical, pro-white, Alaska Independence Party.


As long as you know what your voting for.

To Alaska governor Sarah Palin, African Americans are invisible and should know their place. But you don’t have to believe me.

However, you might want to believe Ms. Gwen Alexander, the president of the African-American Historical Society of Alaska, who told a reporter for The Nation that Palin stated defiantly that she had no intention to hire any minority staffers.

It only gets worse. According to Bishop Dave Thomas, senior pastor of Anchorage-based African-American church Jesus Holy Temple, the Palin administration excluded black business owners from the Alaskan oil and gas pipeline board. “We wasn’t even able or allowed to go into the meetings” to seek contracts for the pipeline, Thomas said.

Palin further alienated Alaska’s black community by becoming the first Alaskan governor in recent memory to not recognize the Juneteenth celebration of the emancipation proclamation. “She doesn’t hire any black people, she doesn’t have any on her staff, so it’s not a surprise that she doesn’t support our Juneteenth celebration,” Alexander said.


Even more Palin racism.

And how about McCains flip flops.

John McCain, the so-called ‘genuine American war hero and patriot,’ certainly has a demonstrated knack for poor judgment and I’m not talking about Sarah Palin.

Case in point, McCain named William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist, to head his presidential transition team, if by some cosmic joke at humanity’s expense, he is elected president.

Timmons worked closely with over a five year period on the lobbying effort to clear members of Saddam Hussein’s government if they were convicted of Federal criminal charges.

The lobbying effort occurred in the years following the first Gulf War, when Washington considered Iraq to be a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism. Timmons dealings on behalf of the deceased Iraqi leader stand in stark contrast to the views of John McCain who has repeatedly stated Saddam Hussein was a sponsor of state terrorism.


Or more of Palins right wind adgenda:
Meet Sarah Palin's radical right-wing pals

Extremists Mark Chryson and Steve Stoll helped launch Palin's political career in Alaska, and in return had influence over policy. "Her door was open," says Chryson -- and still is.


Looks like your team has plenty of skeletons in the closet also, Palin is nothing more than a redneck racist, all she needs is a white hood to Finnish off the ensemble. A vote for Palin is a vote for the KKK, and any other white power terror organization. Are you a racist?

       
The Palins, Sarah and Todd, are members of the radical, pro-white, Alaska Independence Party.


Well, since you can't even get the basics of your argument right, we can safely dismiss the rest of what you followed it with as pure BS.

BTW, what country are you from? That seems somewhat relevant at this point considering you claim to know an awful lot about the US yet have given every indication you don't live anywhere near here.

       
Oct. 7, 2008 | "My government is my worst enemy. I'm going to fight them with any means at hand."

This was former revolutionary terrorist Bill Ayers back in his old Weather Underground days, right? Imagine what Sarah Palin is going to do with this incendiary quote as she tears into Barack Obama this week.

Only one problem. The quote is from Joe Vogler, the raging anti-American who founded the Alaska Independence Party. Inconveniently for Palin, that's the very same secessionist party that her husband, Todd, belonged to for seven years and that she sent a shout-out to as Alaska governor earlier this year. ("Keep up the good work," Palin told AIP members. "And God bless you.";)


Thats who your voting for, an American hating, black hating bigot and racist.

       
Without exception, all of the policies supported by Obama belong to broad categories of public policies that have been supported, in one form or another, by conservative-libertarian thinkers like Friedman and von Hayek and conservative politicians like Reagan, George W. Bush and McCain himself. The differences between them and Obama are differences of degree, not of kind.

But while this is true it may not matter, if McCain's last-minute clarion call is really a racial "dog whistle." The McCain campaign may appear to be debating public philosophy, when in fact it is making a disguised appeal to white racism. If that is the case, then "redistributionist" and "socialist" may be intended to be understood by white swing voters as code words that function the way that "welfare queen" did for the Reagan campaign. A "socialist" or "redistributionist" is a politician who taxes white people like Joe the Plumber and gives money to ... you know who.

If this is the tactic, then it might be working. The polls are tightening in the final days of the campaign. Should McCain surprise the pundits and pull off a victory, historians may judge that it was because of his desperate insinuation that white people would be taxed to pay for welfare for Latinos and blacks. And if he should lose, conservative operatives planning for the next cycle may decide that this was the right tactic, pursued too late. Whether he wins or loses, by using "socialist" and "redistributionist" in an environment in which they were likely to be interpreted as racially charged smears, John McCain may have damaged not only his reputation but our society.

Michael Lind is the Whitehead senior fellow at the New America Foundation


Guess im not the only one who sees McCains policies and selection of Palin as being aimed at racist white voters. Don't give anything to those black bastards huh, not even some heath care. Give them more guns to kill each other so that i can wear my white hood down to the 7-11.

       
Hang out at Daily Kos much? Sure looks like it. Lots of unsubstantiated crap you've found there.

The problem with calling socialism a racist word is that it's got nothing to do with race and everything to do with robbing the rich to give to the poor. Robin Hood style. Karl Marx would be proud of your great Obamassiah. BTW, Marx was white, you know that, right? Redistribution of wealth will take money from Michael Jordan just as much as it would from Donald Trump. But I guess you're just so blinded by the left wing propaganda you can't see that.

BTW, answer the damn question already. What country are you from?

       
Maybe the person posting as 'Obama' really is related to Barak, she's demonstrating a similar style of responding to a direct question which has been asked, in context, with slews of "quotes" cleary meant to obfusicate and distract without any bearing. I was the one who mentioned personal finances in this, but regardless, apparently the answers to "which country are you from?" and "where do you live?" can be paraphrased as 'Palin and McCain are racists'. That seems mildly humorous coming from such a strong supporter of the real Obama who keeps bandying about his black pride and such, despite not really being black himself...

       
Where i live is non of your concern, nor is my race, my sexuality, my gender, my age or any other demographic type data. Are be debating politics here, or do you want to label me so as to reinforce your narrow minded ideology?

       
Conner, you didn't really expect someone who supports a socialist to acknowledge that Obama is in fact only 6% black, did you? He's 44% Arab and 50% something else. I forget what the something else is right now. But it wouldn't be hard to find. In order to fit the legal definition of being part anything, you need to be at least 1/8 that thing. 6% isn't 1/8 of anything. 12.5% would be. But I guess we can't hold facts against our left wing comrades can we?

Ms. Obama, I think it's critically relevant to know where you live, what race you are, and what gender you are since you're the one making such a huge issue over Palin being white, female, and Alaskan. And you're throwing around the whole KKK thing rather freely. Keep in mind, you're the only one so far who injected race as a political issue in all this. Seems only fair we know where you stand in that regard. And on where you live, since you seem to think you know so much about the greatest country on Earth.

( I feel sorry for Dwip and Regina when they drop by to check up on things :P The flood of posts is rather amusing )

       
Samson: No I suppose I didn't, facts have never stopped fanatics from anything in the past, why start now, eh?

Ms. Obama: The only question actually asked was which country you live in which seems extremely germane to the discussion. But since you mentioned the rest, let's discuss what we've been forced by your statements to otherwise conclude anyway. We already know that you are female since you're concerned about whether anyone should be able to tell you what to do with your own body as you stated regarding abortion issues. You seem extremely worried about only the black (with a minor possible addition of latino interest, if only to attempt to procure partners to your defense) perspective, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that you're black, though why that should be a factor in any real way is outside the scope of my logic. You're obviously democratic, you've made that incredibly clear, and that's a demographc if ever there was one. Your opinions are expressed poorly and supported by highly questionable quotes which certainly suggests youth, or at least poor/inomplete education. ...must I continue? Perhaps you'd prefer to simply answer the one question that was actually asked of you, that of which country you are from since it's fairly clear that it is not the United States.

       
Sorry, missed that last line, Samson. That's actually what made me come back tonight instead of just my usual one or two visits to the site for the day. I noticed my RSS feed going nuts and was concerned that if I failed to make another appearance I'd never catch back up. *L*

       
<< prev 1, 2, 3 next >>
Comments Closed
Comments for this entry have been closed.
Anonymous
Register

Forgot Password?

SuMoTuWeThFrSa
 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31